The Al Madina Centre, which Canterbury Council announced would be shut down last month, has long been linked to radical preachers.

Loading

In October 2023, after Hamas’ invasion of Israel, a cleric known only as “Brother Ismail” called Hamas “freedom fighters and warriors”, said jihad was the ­“solution” and praised the flags of ISIS and Al-Qaeda.

“If the Australian government likes it or not, if the ASIO likes it or not, if they want to deport me from Australia or not, jihad is the solution for the Islamic nation,” he said. “There is no other way to defend Muslims and erase this humiliation from the Islamic nation, but fighting for the sake of Allah.”

That sermon prompted NSW Police to launch an investigation, but the probe was dropped after officers determined he had not breached any laws.

This masthead was unable to contact Trad. Others, such as, Sheik Ahmed Zoud, who in December 2023 gave a sermon at the Masjid As-Sunnah mosque in Lakemba in which he said Jews “loved to shed blood” and “ran like rats” from Hamas terrorists on October 7, apologised after legal threats from the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.

Loading

The Minns government has since strengthened hate speech legislation by establishing a new section of the Crimes Act called 93ZAA, which made it a crime to intentionally and publicly incite hatred towards another person, or group of people, on the grounds of race. The law includes an exemption for quoting religious texts.

The laws were criticised at the time, and went against advice from the NSW Law Reform Commission which had baulked at new vilification laws partly because, it argued, terms such as “hatred” were too imprecise. This masthead reported this week that they had only led to two charges since they took effect in August.

However, this masthead can also reveal that in a submission made while the new bill was being drafted Segal urged the government to change “incitement” to “promote” hatred to ensure the law “captures the form of conduct which parliament intends”.

“Whilst the term ‘incite’ has been used in s93Z of the act and in civil vilification provisions for some time, it is utterly unworkable because it fixes the threshold of liability on the likely effect of the conduct on the audience, rather than the conduct itself,” the submission from the envoy states.

In a statement, a spokeswoman for Attorney-General Michael Daley said the government had been “engaging” with the antisemitism envoy, and that the offence of inciting racial hatred would be subject to a review after 12 months.

“We have been very clear about the fact there is more work to do to prevent hate speech,” the spokeswoman said.