Sportsmanship debate: 'Kids look up to him' - Carlsen's outbursts cast shadow over chess
Magnus Carlsen's repeated emotional outbursts, including slamming boards and scattering pieces, have sparked debate about sportsmanship in elite chess. While FIDE prioritizes commercial success, critics argue that unaddressed behavior sends the wrong message to young players who idolize the world champion.
Magnus Carlsen's slams table after losing to Arjun Erigaisi in Doha. (Screengrab)
NEW DELHI: Magnus Carlsen's brilliance over the board is unquestioned, but his repeated emotional outbursts are increasingly sparking debate over the image they project — especially to the next generation of chess players.
The latest flashpoint came during the World Rapid and Blitz Championships in Doha, where the world No. 1's visible frustration once again grabbed headlines, raising concerns about sportsmanship and accountability in elite chess.Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW!Carlsen's anger boiled over after defeats in Doha, most notably against India's Arjun Erigaisi, when he slammed the board in frustration.
It echoed scenes from Norway Chess last year, where he thumped the table following a shock loss to D Gukesh. These were not isolated incidents. During the same event in Doha, Carlsen was involved in four separate controversial moments, including one where he scattered pieces in time trouble, leading to an illegal move and eventual concession after an argument with the arbiter.
GM Raunak Sadhwani Exclusive: Becoming Grandmaster at 13, hidden costs of the game, and more #chess
While Carlsen went on to silence critics with yet another triumph — his 20th world title and ninth Blitz crown — the manner of his conduct has divided opinion within the chess community.
Former Gukesh coach and Grandmaster Srinath Narayanan acknowledged that emotion has a place in the sport but warned of its consequences. “A certain kind of expression of emotion is good for chess. We need those expressions because people generally don't see what is happening to a chess player's mind,” he told The Indian Express. “The danger… is that people perceive it to be something cool. And Magnus is very influential… kids look up to him.
”
Poll
Should Magnus Carlsen be held accountable for his emotional outbursts during games?
Yes, he should face consequencesNo, it's just part of the gameIt depends on the situation
That concern was echoed by Levon Aronian, who criticised the normalisation of such behaviour. “I don't think we should be normalising tantrums like that,” Aronian wrote on X, noting that loud outbursts can disrupt other players and would attract penalties in many sports.Despite criticism, FIDE has shown little appetite to formally censure Carlsen. The governing body insisted that such moments are part of an “open and engaged” sporting ecosystem and stressed that the growing visibility and commercial success of chess remains its priority.For critics, that stance is precisely the problem. Srinath argued that financial penalties or reprimands would send a clear message. “Leaving it unaddressed… kids get the message that it is a cool thing to do,” he said.