We let ChatGPT judge impossible superhero debates — here's how it ruled
ChatGPT referees superhero debates
(Image credit: Jorge Jimenez/Instagram)
Every comic book fan has opinions they’ll defend until the end of time. Maybe you’re convinced Spider-Man could outwit Batman in a fight, or that Wonder Woman would crush Thor in a no-holds-barred brawl.
These debates are part of what makes superhero fandom fun, even as they blur lines between logic, nostalgia bias, and archival reading of decades of comic books. But what would an AI chatbot tasked to be a neutral referee decide?
Superman versus Hulk armwrestling
(Image credit: Marvel Studios)
I started with a variation on a classic question of strength between Superman and the Hulk. Rather than just say who would win in a fight (Superman usually looks likely to come out on top when they've battled in comics, albeit with lots of unusual circumstances making the final outcome unclear on purpose), I went with a single clash – an arm-wrestling match.
“In terms of raw baseline strength, Superman tends to have the edge – he can move planets and has consistent strength feats across decades of comics," ChatGPT acknowledged. "The Hulk, on the other hand, doesn’t have a ceiling. The madder he gets, the stronger he becomes, which makes him uniquely dangerous in any test of strength that lasts more than a few seconds.”
So already, the match has a built-in narrative arc. Superman starts strong. Hulk escalates. The AI treated the stakes seriously, setting up the logistics of a hypothetical match. The AI It ran an analysis of a potential scenario.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
“If this is a regulated, single-round arm-wrestling match with rules and a ref, Superman likely wins before Hulk can reach planet-shattering levels of anger. But if you allow the match to go on indefinitely or let Hulk work himself into a rage, things get murky. And if the table breaks? All bets are off.”
It’s hard to argue with that. A quick, rule-bound match favors Clark Kent. But if the contest goes long and messy – well, then it's a banner day for Bruce. Of course, an angry Hulk might refuse to ever accept a loss.
“The psychological component here shouldn't be ignored," ChatGPT explained. "Superman wins and likely shrugs it off, but Hulk may rage into the next week, punching asteroids and demanding a rematch. Emotion plays as big a role as strength when you're dealing with gamma-fueled grudges.”
Lex Luthor versus Iron Man on Shark Tank
(Image credit: Disney/Marvel Studios)
For the second debate, I left behind fists and flying for a test of business acumen and technology with a marketing twist. Who could score a better investment from the likes of Mark Cuban and Barbara Corcoran on the business-pitch TV contest Shark Tank: Tony Stark, aka Iron Man, or Superman's nemesis, Lex Luthor?
ChatGPT framed the scenario as a battle of charisma versus ruthlessness. It painted a scene of Shark Tank with the two comic book characters (presumably shorn of their respective fortunes in this scenario).
“Tony Stark walks in with style, showmanship, and a proven track record of successful innovation. Lex Luthor brings gravitas, intimidation, and a chillingly well-thought-out pitch deck that likely includes geopolitical leverage.”
The idea of big brains battling for an investment prize isn't quite the visual spectacle of a power-armor battle, but the use of personality and presentation certainly makes for fierce competition. The contrast between Stark's flashy approach and Luthor's cold efficiency is strong, but ChatGPT ultimately leaned toward Iron Man. The verdict came down to audience perception and investor psychology.
“Sharks typically invest in the person as much as the product. Stark’s pitch might be chaotic, but he’d win them over with charm and vision. Lex might offer better margins, but his moral ambiguity would raise red flags – even for Shark Tank host Kevin O’Leary. But if Lex frames his pitch around sustainable energy, health tech, or surveillance tools with broad government contracts, he might bypass moral concerns by appealing to the Sharks' sense of opportunity. Cold competence can be lucrative if dressed in the right branding.”
Super road trip playlist
Musical taste is subjective, but everyone knows the right playlist makes any long trip go faster, even without super speed. So I asked ChatGPT which superhero would make the best road trip playlist. ChatGPT immediately threw some names around: Star-Lord, Spider-Man, The Flash. But it had a clear favorite.
“Peter Quill, a.k.a. Star-Lord, is literally canonically obsessed with curated mixtapes. His entire emotional vocabulary is built around music, from Electric Light Orchestra to Redbone. He doesn’t just know songs—he knows moments.”
Star-Lord's Walkman is arguably one of the stars of the Guardians of the Galaxy trilogy and helps define the movies as much as the character. It's easy to imagine Quill making an upbeat mix of classic rock hits and probably some deep cuts from the same time. Plus, he’d insist on narrating transitions between tracks.
ChatGPT said the runner-up would be Spider-Man, which surprised me since Peter Parker famously travels by web (except for that embarrassing period with the Spider-Mobile).
“Spider-Man has a chaotic energy that pairs well with eclectic playlists. Expect sudden jumps from indie bangers to nerdy rap to Broadway cast recordings. He might accidentally play a podcast for five minutes, but you’d be smiling.” And just in case the stereo breaks, travel with Dinah Lance, the Black Canary. She'll sing you to your destination."
Superheroic logic
Watching an AI chatbot apply its model to the fuzzy rules of fictional logic is intriguing. Seeing it mimic how people interpret tropes, character history, and impossible or at least unlikely matchups was amusing, even if it was far calmer than true fans would be.
What ChatGPT does best in these contexts is less about providing an answer than it is about setting up a way of thinking about these trivial things with something approaching actual rigor. And the AI even produced its own sort of philosophy about these kinds of arguments.
“Superhero debates endure because they tap into aspirational identity. Who we want to be, who we fear becoming, and how we navigate those tensions through fantasy."
Next time, I think I'll ask whether Alfred or Aunt May would be better at running an Airbnb.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!
And of course you can also follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.
Eric Hal Schwartz is a freelance writer for TechRadar with more than 15 years of experience covering the intersection of the world and technology. For the last five years, he served as head writer for Voicebot.ai and was on the leading edge of reporting on generative AI and large language models. He's since become an expert on the products of generative AI models, such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude, Google Gemini, and every other synthetic media tool. His experience runs the gamut of media, including print, digital, broadcast, and live events. Now, he's continuing to tell the stories people want and need to hear about the rapidly evolving AI space and its impact on their lives. Eric is based in New York City.
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.